Do teachers still claim that anything found on the interwebs is invalid research? I remember a time when it at least felt that way, and wikipedia didn't even exist yet.
Panel one of this comic is hyperbole, but it certainly feels that way sometimes, am I right? I mean, I hope it's hyperbole. They were all human and bound to have flaws, but I'd like to think a good percentage don't fall under the "horrible" category, right?
Right? Why are all you history professors avoiding eye contact with me?